Institutional Banter 2 Institutional Banter 2
0
 
May 22, 2012, 09:56:47 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: We're having a crime wave, a Waterdeep crime wave...
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: In other related good news  (Read 401 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Brand Nar Gath
Supreme Personality of Geekhead
******
Posts: 3047


I do not boink Sheep. Often.


« on: May 07, 2008, 11:18:56 AM »

A ray of good news-
 
Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection
By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 26, 2006; A03
The largest study of its kind has unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer.   The new findings "were against our expectations," said Donald Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who has studied marijuana for 30 years.  "We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use," he said. "What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect."

Federal health and drug enforcement officials have widely used Tashkin's previous work on marijuana to make the case that the drug is dangerous. Tashkin said that while he still believes marijuana is potentially harmful, its cancer-causing effects appear to be of less concern than previously thought.  Earlier work established that marijuana does contain cancer-causing chemicals as potentially harmful as those in tobacco, he said. However, marijuana also contains the chemical THC, which he said may kill aging cells and keep them from becoming cancerous.

Tashkin's study, funded by the National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse, involved 1,200 people in Los Angeles who had lung, neck or head cancer and an additional 1,040 people without cancer matched by age, sex and neighborhood.  They were all asked about their lifetime use of marijuana, tobacco and alcohol. The heaviest marijuana smokers had lighted up more than 22,000 times, while moderately heavy usage was defined as smoking 11,000 to 22,000 marijuana cigarettes. Tashkin found that even the very heavy marijuana smokers showed no increased incidence of the three cancers studied.

"This is the largest case-control study ever done, and everyone had to fill out a very extensive questionnaire about marijuana use," he said. "Bias can creep into any research, but we controlled for as many confounding factors as we could, and so I believe these results have real meaning."  Tashkin's group at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA had hypothesized that marijuana would raise the risk of cancer on the basis of earlier small human studies, lab studies of animals, and the fact that marijuana users inhale more deeply and generally hold smoke in their lungs longer than tobacco smokers -- exposing them to the dangerous chemicals for a longer time. In addition, Tashkin said, previous studies found that marijuana tar has 50 percent higher concentrations of chemicals linked to cancer than tobacco cigarette tar.

While no association between marijuana smoking and cancer was found, the study findings, presented to the American Thoracic Society International Conference this week, did find a 20-fold increase in lung cancer among people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.  The study was limited to people younger than 60 because those older than that were generally not exposed to marijuana in their youth, when it is most often tried.
Logged

Here & Back Again.
Jean-Sebastian Clement
Le Voleur
Administrator
Alpha Geek
*****
Posts: 279



WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2008, 01:40:12 PM »

Tashkin's group at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA had hypothesized that marijuana would raise the risk of cancer on the basis of earlier small human studies...

That's what they get for doing their studies on small humans. They should have gone for the full-sized ones.
Logged

Beware the Tears of Lilith!
Brand Nar Gath
Supreme Personality of Geekhead
******
Posts: 3047


I do not boink Sheep. Often.


« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2008, 02:05:50 PM »

experiments on dwarfs are a long standing tradition in eastern and western science...
Logged

Here & Back Again.
Genlok
Alpha Geek
***
Posts: 192



« Reply #3 on: May 07, 2008, 04:16:20 PM »

While this is largely known as fact it should also be noted that testing on dwarfs is typically done to discover the maximum point at which an effect begins to occur...while testing on Canadians (and their counterparts - Genoans) are used directly after animal testing has concluded so that a minimum threshold can be established.

What's truly disturbing is that Animals have Right's Groups but Canadians (and poor, defenseless Genoans) continue to be ignored.   Cry
Logged
Brand Nar Gath
Supreme Personality of Geekhead
******
Posts: 3047


I do not boink Sheep. Often.


« Reply #4 on: May 07, 2008, 05:10:49 PM »

While this is largely known as fact it should also be noted that testing on dwarfs is typically done to discover the maximum point at which an effect begins to occur...while testing on Canadians (and their counterparts - Genoans) are used directly after animal testing has concluded so that a minimum threshold can be established.

What's truly disturbing is that Animals have Right's Groups but Canadians (and poor, defenseless Genoans) continue to be ignored.   Cry

A-geez... I don't a-know, but it-a seems to me that we might have-a a Genoan sympathizer in our midst.... hey-a dwarfie, your mother is a Genoan! hahaha
Logged

Here & Back Again.
Jean-Sebastian Clement
Le Voleur
Administrator
Alpha Geek
*****
Posts: 279



WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2008, 11:42:45 PM »

Logged

Beware the Tears of Lilith!
Brand Nar Gath
Supreme Personality of Geekhead
******
Posts: 3047


I do not boink Sheep. Often.


« Reply #6 on: May 08, 2008, 12:35:38 PM »

Oh-a My God!  I will-a always a-regret my final words to the dwarf.
Logged

Here & Back Again.
Genlok
Alpha Geek
***
Posts: 192



« Reply #7 on: May 08, 2008, 02:14:15 PM »

SEE !  SEE THERE !  THAT'S why we don't belong in the Circus, jumping about to bemuse others.  Mom tried to warm him but Nooo....  She said to always carry your axe wherever you may go but  Nooo......  She told him not to join the Circus but Noooo.....  He just wanted to be a fool, to play out his life safely and now look what happened.  Now who will I have to play Hungry Hungry Hippos with?
Logged
Brand Nar Gath
Supreme Personality of Geekhead
******
Posts: 3047


I do not boink Sheep. Often.


« Reply #8 on: May 08, 2008, 08:24:15 PM »

um, why did your mum 'warm' him?  I feel pretty uncomfortable with this kind of talk of the board.  the feds are 1 step behind 'dwarf love.''... you know, I don't think that he was in the circus to 'bemuse' others.... see my earlier post on the scientific effects of herbal 'bemusement'...
Logged

Here & Back Again.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme by m3talc0re. Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC MySQL | PHP | XHTML | CSS
Back To Top